May 5, 2009
By Robin Harris, D. Phil.
Speaking to the U.S. Congress in February, President Barack
Obama proclaimed, "There is no force more powerful than the example
of America." Had the statement been made by a different President,
it would doubtless have been condemned by the media as hubris. But,
strip aside the moralising, and it does contain this much truth.
Other countries do closely watch what America does, because they
admire America's success -- especially material success -- and they
want to recreate it for themselves. But examples work both
For it is also true that America can set a powerfully bad
example, which other nations, for their own bad reasons, will be
tempted to follow. That is precisely what is happening now. Whether
they will emulate President Obama in his foreign policy of
high-minded self-abasement is more than doubtful. But they are
certainly tempted to copy his socialistic economics -- not least
Britain, which despite the lessons taught by Margaret Thatcher has
never got socialism altogether out of its system.
Britain's Prime Minister , Gordon Brown, is among the political
walking dead. If anything like current voting intentions
materialise in the general election to be called next year, he will
be looking for a post with the IMF before Obama's spending splurge
is complete. In the meantime, though, he can draw comfort, if not
gain support, from describing his program of financial profligacy
as part of a global consensus, to which America's celebrity
President now gives a moral lead.
A belated lead, of course, he would add. The administration of
President George W. Bush sharply increased federal spending. But
that was never an end in itself; it was regretted; and Bush did not
then cement the over-spending with higher taxes -- in fact, he cut
them. Now, though, the world can see it is different. Yesterday's
deviation has become today's direction.
With a massive, unfunded, pork-laden, fiscal stimulus unmatched
in the country's history, America has resolved to spend, borrow,
plan and inflate its way out of trouble. Almost overnight, a
tradition of pioneering, free wheeling, self reliance has yielded
to a governing philosophy closer to old fashioned European-style
So it is strange that the continental Europeans, who have well
entrenched statist philosophies, are thus far proving unwilling to
follow America's new statist solutions. The Europeans want more
international regulation, it is true, but that is mainly with a
view to pursuing their age-old policy of restraining American power
-- something which Obama will soon discover has not stopped. But
France, Germany and the Central-East European states have no wish
to bankrupt themselves by pursuing the new American way. Britain,
by contrast, cannot wait, and, under Brown, has not, in fact,
Before Rahm Emanuel came up with his catchy phrase about "never
letting a crisis go to waste," Gordon Brown, who has never uttered
a catchy phrase in his life, had acted on it. For ten years as Tony
Blair's Chancellor of the Exchequer, first slowly but then with
less restraint, Brown has been pushing up spending and borrowing,
relying on levels of economic growth levels that couldn't
Then as Prime Minister, he was faced with the consequences of
his mismanagement at precisely the moment of global meltdown. Brown
might, of course, have donned his hair shirt and imposed cuts.
Instead, he pulled his old red shirt out of New Labour's closet and
embarked upon a massive programme of spending, borrowing, printing,
nationalisation and subsidy. But, as Labour Governments have
discovered in the past, he found that the markets were wary of
So he faced a new dilemma. Belatedly to cut? He dare not. To
pretend things weren't so bad? Worth a go. To raise taxes? Of
course! Moreover, to do so in the way the comrades always
preferred, by stinging the rich.
Obviously it makes no economic sense. When Thatcher's government
in 1988 cut the top rate of income tax from 60 to 40 per cent, the
effect was not just to increase revenues but also to increase the
total share of tax paid by the richest group. Less demonstrably
but, no less certainly, it also increased wealth creation. Mr
Brown's latest tax hike for top earners to 50 per cent will have
the opposite effect. It puts Britain back near the top of the
international high tax league, whereas Thatcher inaugurated a low
It also leaves Britain still dangerously in the red, back at the
level of borrowing of the 1970s. In the later Thatcher years,
Britain repaid debt. Now Britain is set to borrow 12 per cent of
GDP and keep on borrowing. Yet even these horrible figures mislead,
and are designed to, because they assume a swift recovery that no
one beside Brown considers credible.
There is another figure which is even more worrying -- and it
should worry America too. Although the Labour Government's poll
ratings are abysmal, 57 per cent of the population approves of the
new 50 per cent tax rate. This is envy fuelled by fear, and once
enough of the population depends on government, fear is easy for
politicians to fuel. What Thatcher's mentor, Sir Keith Joseph, in
the 1970s described as the "ratchet effect" works when each new
bout of government intervention creates a momentum for more of it.
Someone has to be bold enough to force back the ratchet.
Unfortunately, no such person is in sight. Responding to the 50
per cent tax hike, the Conservatives' Shadow Chancellor, George
Osborne, limply observed: "I don't like it. I don't think in the
long run higher taxes are a great idea for an economy. However, I
cannot promise to reverse it." No trumpet sound was ever less
certain. The Conservatives will probably win next year. But they
will receive and have sought no mandate for reversing the
socialisation of Britain's economy. Perhaps they might have found
the courage to do so, if America were not itself pursuing the same
ruinous policy as Gordon Brown.
Tourists visiting the crypt of London's St. Paul's Cathedral
will find a Latin inscription engraved on the tomb of its great
architect, Sir Christopher Wren. It reads (in translation): "If you
seek his memorial, look around you". Americans who look around them
now at the state of Britain left by Gordon Brown can discover some
awful lessons for their own country.
Britain is suffering a bloated, feather-bedded public sector,
unreformed welfare, centralised and top heavy services, a crushing
burden of debt, taxes that drive out talent, a political class that
has turned in on itself, and a population that seems to have lost
all hope of self-betterment through its efforts. If America does
not wish to go the same way, it should wake up.
Harris was a member of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher's
Policy Unit and is now Senior Visiting Fellow at The Heritage
First Appeared in Human Events
Speaking to the U.S. Congress in February, President Barack Obama proclaimed, "There is no force more powerful than the example of America." Had the statement been made by a different President, it would doubtless have been condemned by the media as hubris. But, strip aside the moralising, and it does contain this much truth. Other countries do closely watch what America does, because they admire America's success -- especially material success -- and they want to recreate it for themselves. But examples work both ways.
Robin Harris, D. Phil.
Senior Visiting Fellow
Read More >>
Heritage's daily Morning Bell e-mail keeps you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.
The subscription is free and delivers you the latest conservative policy perspectives on the news each weekday--straight from Heritage experts.
The Morning Bell is your daily wake-up call offering a fresh, conservative analysis of the news.
More than 450,000 Americans rely on Heritage's Morning Bell to stay up to date on the policy battles that affect them.
Rush Limbaugh says "The Heritage Foundation's Morning Bell is just terrific!"
Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) says it's "a great way to start the day for any conservative who wants to get America back on track."
Sign up to start your free subscription today!
The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute,
with hundreds of thousands of individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in
February 1973, has a staff of 275 and an annual expense budget of $82.4 million.
Our mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free
enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national
defense. Read More
© 2014, The Heritage Foundation Conservative policy research since 1973