June 10, 2005
By Melissa G. Pardue
Experienced parents will tell you that if you can get your kids
through the teen years, they likely will be just fine as adults.
That's because teens face many of the temptations adults do but
without the experience to appreciate the consequences of their
But what if we could somehow transfer some of that experience to
teens? What if we could equip them with the information, courage
and responsibility they need to say no to sex, smoking, drinking
and drug abuse?
It's a question that's received a fair amount of study, and we've
begun to find some approaches that work. One is to take on the
issue directly with teens through what are known as
abstinence-education programs. Among the most effective of these,
according to a recent study by Dr. Robert Lerner published in the
Institute for Youth Development's peer-reviewed journal
Adolescent & Family Health, is the Best Friends
Lerner's study found that students who took part in Best Friends
Looked at another way, girls who took part in Best Friends
One would think that such numbers would cause lawmakers to
rethink how government deals with destructive teen behavior. One
would be wrong.
Despite overwhelming evidence that kids are receptive to an
abstinence-only approach and that increases in abstinence-only
education are largely responsible for a drop of 8 percentage points
(from 54 percent to 46 percent) since 1991 in the number of
high-schoolers who have had sex, the government continues to spend
$12 on "safe sex" and contraception promotion for every $1 it
spends on abstinence.
This doesn't stop groups such as the Sexuality Information and
Education Council of the United States (SIECUS) and Advocates for
Youth from attempting to eliminate abstinence programs and replace
them with "comprehensive" sex education. These "comprehensive"
programs are often misleadingly labeled "abstinence-plus" and
falsely claim to forge a middle ground between abstinence and "safe
sex" education. In reality, these programs are virtually all "plus"
and no abstinence.
Analysis of "comprehensive" sex-ed programs reveals that these
curricula contain little if any meaningful abstinence information.
On average, these curricula devote about 4 percent of their content
to abstinence and the rest to such enlightening activities as
"condom races," in which teams of teens race to see who can get a
condom on a cucumber the fastest.
They explore "alternatives" to intercourse, such as sensual
feeding, showering together and other activities that seem highly
unlikely to discourage kids from having sex. In fact, out of 942
total pages of curriculum text reviewed from nine different
"comprehensive" sex-ed curricula, not a single sentence
was found urging teens to abstain from sexual activity until they
had graduated from high school. The overwhelming focus of these
curricula (28 percent of the curriculum content) is devoted to
promoting contraception among teens.
Sadly, these programs have friends in high places. Opponents in
Congress continue to attempt to introduce legislation that would
abolish federal abstinence education assistance. A proposal by Sen.
Max Baucus (D-Mont.) would take federal funds devoted to teaching
abstinence and turn them over to state public health bureaucracies
to spend as they wish.
Given the fact that such bureaucracies, through the encouragement
of federal funding, have been wedded to the "safe sex" approach for
decades and fiercely oppose teaching abstinence, such a proposal
would effectively abolish federal abstinence-education programs.
Meanwhile, federal support for "safe sex" and contraception
promotion would continue, unchecked.
Opponents of abstinence education will continue to try to eliminate
it from America's schools. But they have got a tough pitch to make:
Parents overwhelmingly support the abstinence message. Students
want to hear it. The evidence of abstinence programs' effectiveness
is increasing. And the evaluation of the Best Friends program
provides one more argument in favor of abstinence education.
Melissa Pardue is the Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Fellow in Social
Welfare Policy at The Heritage Foundation.
First appeared on Knight-Ridder Tribune
Experienced parents will tell you that if you can get your kids through the teen years, they likely will be just fine as adults. That's because teens face many of the temptations adults do but without the experience to appreciate the consequences of their decisions.
Melissa G. Pardue
Read More >>
Heritage's daily Morning Bell e-mail keeps you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.
The subscription is free and delivers you the latest conservative policy perspectives on the news each weekday--straight from Heritage experts.
The Morning Bell is your daily wake-up call offering a fresh, conservative analysis of the news.
More than 200,000 Americans rely on Heritage's Morning Bell to stay up to date on the policy battles that affect them.
Rush Limbaugh says "The Heritage Foundation's Morning Bell is just terrific!"
Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) says it's "a great way to start the day for any conservative who wants to get America back on track."
Sign up to start your free subscription today!
The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute, with hundreds of thousands of individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in February 1973, has a staff of 275 and an annual expense budget of $82.4 million.
Our mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Read More
© 2013, The Heritage Foundation Conservative policy research since 1973