• Heritage Action
  • Heritage Libertad
  • More
  • Commentary posted April 15, 2013 by Nina Owcharenko Obama Offers One More Reason States Shouldn't Rush to Expand Medicaid

    Tucked away in the president’s latest budget was a recommendation to delay scheduled cuts in payments to hospitals that treat large numbers of the uninsured patients and therefore provide a disproportionate amount of uncompensated care. The cuts in Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) payments were enacted under Obamacare, and the call to postpone them constitutes…

  • Commentary posted March 8, 2013 by Nina Owcharenko Obamacare Option Puts Patients Taxpayers at Risk

    To extend health coverage to millions of currently uninsured Americans, the architects of Obamacare relied heavily on the idea that states would open up their already strained Medicaid programs to tens of millions of new people. But expanding Medicaid is risky business. Not only can it lead to lower quality of care for people within the program, it can also risk busting…

  • Issue Brief posted March 5, 2013 by Nina Owcharenko Why the Obamacare Medicaid Expansion Is Bad for Taxpayers and Patients

    Medicaid needs reform, not expansion. This federal–state health care program provides health care to over 60 million Americans and consumes a growing portion of state and federal budgets. Research shows a long history of Medicaid enrollees having worse access and outcomes than privately insured individuals.[1] Due in part to low reimbursement, one in three doctors refuses…

  • Commentary posted February 10, 2013 by Nina Owcharenko Gov. Scott Walker Should Resist This Obamacare Temptation

    Pressure is mounting on Gov. Scott Walker to expand Medicaid as part of the Affordable Care Act. Obamacare proponents say the expansion is a no-brainer - that the federal government will pick up the tab and bring even more doctors into the struggling health care program for the poor. But this deal is too good to be true. The proposed Medicaid expansion would likely end…

  • Commentary posted February 5, 2013 by Nina Owcharenko Health Care and the Debt Deal

    In agreeing to a temporary increase in the debt ceiling, the House attached several conditions. One was a commitment to pass a budget that will balance within 10 years. Meeting that goal is important not only for the country’s fiscal future but also for the future of the country’s health care. Health care entitlements are a major driver of federal spending. In 2011,…

  • Commentary posted February 5, 2013 by Nina Owcharenko Why Medicaid Expansion Is Still Wrong for the States

    Governor John Kasich now joins the list of governors that are looking to expand their Medicaid programs. In some instances, the logic of such a decision makes sense. Democratic governors have traditionally supported expanding the role of Medicaid. But the decision by Republican governors, such as Governor Jan Brewer (Ariz.), Governor Jack Dalrymple (N.D.), Governor Susana…

  • Issue Brief posted December 12, 2012 by Nina Owcharenko, Edmund F. Haislmaier Medicaid Expansion and State Health Exchanges: A Risky Proposition for the States

    Recent decisions by the Obama Administration concerning the health care exchanges and Medicaid expansion underscore what a risky proposition the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) is for the states. Congress presumed in PPACA (Obamacare) that the states would agree to build and run exchanges and could be forced to expand Medicaid. The Supreme Court,…

  • Commentary posted December 1, 2012 by Nina Owcharenko, Robert E. Moffit, Ph.D. Securing a Downpayment on Medicare Reform

    Far from coping with the explosive costs of Medicare, the Obama Administration’s latest fiscal cliff offer is laughably inadequate. The proposal remains stubbornly uninformed by the serious thinking of a variety of Medicare experts over the past several years.  These experts—ranging from  the Simpson- Bowles Commission to former CBO Director Alice Rivlin of the…

  • Commentary posted November 10, 2012 by Nina Owcharenko Expanding Medicaid Plans is a Costly Mistake for States

    States are already struggling to pay their Medicaid bills. Why put taxpayers on the hook to pay even more? Medicaid is the single biggest item in state budgets today. It consumes, on average, 23 percent of state dollars spent, pinching funds for other high-priority functions - such as education, transportation and emergency services. Yet expanding Medicaid was a…

  • Commentary posted October 4, 2012 by Nina Owcharenko Supreme Court Allows States to Opt out of Medicaid Expansion

    States are already struggling to pay their Medicaid bills. Why put taxpayers on the hook to pay even more? Medicaid is the single biggest item in state budgets today. It consumes, on average, 23 percent of state dollars spent, pinching funds for other high-priority functions such as education, transportation and emergency services. Yet expanding Medicaid was a…

  • Commentary posted October 3, 2012 by Nina Owcharenko There is No 'Conservative Case for Obamacare'

    Sometimes, messaging eclipses policy. Exhibit A:  JD Kleinke’s New York Times opinion piece--which offers a purely superficial case for why conservatives should support Obamacare. Kleinke’s column—like Obamacare itself—tries to cover up a liberal policy agenda by hijacking conservative principles and terminology.  That proponents of the law must resort to such…

  • Commentary posted August 17, 2012 by Nina Owcharenko Ryan Plan Turns Medicare's Promises Into Real Dollars, Not IOUs

    With more than $37 trillion in unfunded obligations and 77 million baby boomers set to enter retirement, Medicare is facing a fiscal and demographic tsunami. Even President Barack Obama has conceded that Medicare will not be there for future retirees unless it is reformed. Rep. Paul Ryan's plan for Medicare is the best way to get the program out of the storm and is far…

  • Issue Brief posted July 11, 2012 by Nina Owcharenko The Supreme Court’s Medicaid Decision: The Obamacare Mess Just Got Messier

    If the Administration’s attempt to centralize health care decision making in Washington was unworkable, its unconstitutional imposition on the states has made its problems even worse. Long before the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down the Medicaid mandate on the states as unconstitutionally coercive, opponents of the health care law argued that it would be…

  • Issue Brief posted June 18, 2012 by Nina Owcharenko Why Congress Should Not Preserve Flawed Obamacare Policies

    The U.S. Supreme Court is poised to rule on the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act (commonly known as “Obamacare”). In anticipation of an unfavorable Court decision, liberals in Congress and elsewhere are arguing that a repeal of Obamacare would end reforms currently in effect and that these reforms enjoy broad popular support. But Congress should not fall into…