WebMemo posted March 19, 2010 by John L. Ligon, Robert A. Book, Ph.D.
The House Health Fix: Even Higher Tax Penalties for Employers
Under House Reconciliation Act of 2010 (H.R. 4872), employers will face even greater penalties than mandated by earlier versions of “health care reform” legislation, such as H.R. 3590. Specifically, employers with more than 50 workers that do not offer a “qualified” health plan or pay 60 percent of health insurance premiums would face an annual tax penalty of $2,000 per…
Backgrounder posted February 17, 2010 by Jason Fodeman, M.D., Robert A. Book, Ph.D.
"Bending the Curve": What Really Drives Health Care Spending
Abstract: Contrary to their stated intent, the health care reform bills passed by the House and Senate would substantially increase health care spending if either became law. Based on a fundamental misunderstanding of what drives health care spending, these bills exacerbate many of the inefficiencies in the U.S. health care system, particularly those that drive…
WebMemo posted January 22, 2010 by Robert A. Book, Ph.D.
Squeezing out Private Health Plans
The Senate health care bill passed on December 24 does not contain an explicit “public option.” It does, however, still include provisions that could put private health plans out of business. Specially, the bill would:
Give federal regulators the power to define minimum benefit packages;
Specify by law the minimum amount that health plans must spend…
Backgrounder posted December 18, 2009 by William W. Beach, Robert A. Book, Ph.D., Karen Campbell, Ph.D., Rea S. Hederman, Jr., David W. Kreutzer, Ph.D., John L. Ligon, Robert E. Moffit, Ph.D., David B. Muhlhausen, Ph.D., Guinevere Nell, Kathryn Nix, Nina Owcharenko, Jason Richwine, Ph.D., James Sherk, Kisa Smith, Patrick Tyrrell, Paul L. Winfree
An Analysis of the Senate Democrats' Health Care Bill
Abstract: The Senate health care bill would overhaul the entire health care sector of the U.S. economy by erecting massive federal controls over private health insurance, dictating the content of insurance benefit packages and the use of medical treatments, procedures, and medical devices. It would alter the relationship between the federal government and the states,…
WebMemo posted December 17, 2009 by Robert A. Book, Ph.D.
Employment Discrimination in the Senate Health Care Bill
The Senate health care bill includes a well-known "employer mandate" provision that would require employers to either offer a "qualified" health plan and pay 60 percent of the premium or pay an annual tax penalty of $750 per full-time employee.
What is less well-known is that the provision would also tax companies even if they do offer insurance -- but only if they…
WebMemo posted December 3, 2009 by Robert A. Book, Ph.D.
How the Senate Health Bill Punishes Businesses That Hire Low-Income Workers
Suppose you wanted to prevent single parents and people from lower-income families from getting a job. How about imposing a $3,000 tax penalty on any employer who hired such a person instead of an equally qualified, equally paid person from a higher-income family? Would that do the trick?
It would do the trick quite nicely—but since no decent person actually wants…
WebMemo posted November 9, 2009 by Robert A. Book, Ph.D.
Government-Run Health Care Even Without the Public Option
One of the most-discussed issues in the health care reform debate is whether to include a government-run, "public option" health plan. President Obama says a government plan is necessary to "keep insurance companies honest," but opponents -- and even some proponents of the public option -- say that a public option will reduce competition and choice and become a step on…