Environmental Protection Agency

HIGHLIGHTS

Our Research & Offerings on Environmental Protection Agency
  • Issue Brief posted March 23, 2012 by Jack Spencer Whitfield Stands Up to EPA for Lower Gas Prices

    Congressman Ed Whitfield (R–KY) released legislation yesterday that would force the Obama Administration to reveal how its environmental regulations impact gasoline prices. Specifically, the Gasoline Regulations Act of 2012[1] would create a Transportation Fuels Regulatory Committee consisting of officials from the Departments of Energy,…

  • Backgrounder posted March 13, 2012 by James Gattuso, Diane Katz Red Tape Rising: Obama-Era Regulation at the Three-Year Mark

    Abstract: During the first three years of the Obama Administration, 106 new major federal regulations added more than $46 billion per year in new costs for Americans. This is almost four times the number—and more than five times…

  • Commentary posted November 23, 2011 by Nicolas Loris Stuffed with CO2 Regulations

    Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa P. Jackson recently announced that her agency would proceed with twice-delayed regulations targeting power plants that emit carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. Mrs. Jackson’s decision ignores three vital pieces of information that should make it easy for Congress to prevent unelected bureaucrats from regulating…

  • Backgrounder posted November 16, 2011 by Nicolas Loris New EPA Inspector General Report: One More Reason to Reject Climate-Change Regulation

    Abstract: The Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) has released a report showing that the EPA did not comply with federal data guidelines when providing its technical support document (TSD) for the EPA’s 2009 “endangerment finding.” The EPA used the TSD to…

  • WebMemo posted September 15, 2011 by Wendell Cox How Smart Growth and Livability Intensify Air Pollution

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) wants to implement stronger air pollution restrictions on ozone (smog) for the stated purpose of improving public health.[1] These regulations are misguided because they would impose significant costs for little or no benefit.[2] At the same time, policies being implemented at…

  • WebMemo posted August 1, 2011 by Andrew Grossman High on Ozone: The EPA’s Latest Assault on Jobs and the Economy

    The U.S. economy won a temporary reprieve with the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) announcement last week that new ozone standards, which had been slated for this summer, will be delayed. The EPA’s “reconsideration” of the ozone standards it set in 2008 and issuance of more stringent standards violate all three…

  • WebMemo posted May 25, 2011 by Diane Katz EPA’s Boiler MACT Rules Still a Threat

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has postponed imposition of unduly onerous regulations governing emissions from hundreds of thousands of commercial, institutional, and industrial boilers. While the action is welcome, it would be premature to conclude that the Obama Administration has undergone a regulatory epiphany. Instead, the postponement reveals the extent…

  • WebMemo posted March 3, 2011 by Diane Katz Coming Clean on Regulatory Costs and Benefits

    Just hours before a congressional hearing this week related to the high costs of regulation, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released a report purporting to show that the Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1990 will avert 230,000 premature deaths and yield economic benefits totaling $2 trillion in the year…

  • Backgrounder posted January 26, 2011 by Diane Katz Rolling Back Red Tape: 20 Regulations to Eliminate

    Abstract: As the new Congress assembles, many legisla­tors are considering how to lessen the regulatory burden on Americans. President Obama, too, now says that he wants to root out unnecessary government rules. With regulatory costs at record levels, relief is sorely needed. But it…

  • Lecture posted June 16, 2010 by Ben Lieberman The Economics of Global Warming Policy

    My name is Ben Lieberman and I’m the Senior Policy Analyst for Energy and Environment at The Heritage Foundation. I’m proud to say that I’ve either participated in, or attended, all four of the Heartland Institute’s global warming conferences. If there’s a fifth and a sixth, I’ll be there, too.…

Find more work on Environmental Protection Agency
  • Backgrounder posted March 13, 2012 by James Gattuso, Diane Katz Red Tape Rising: Obama-Era Regulation at the Three-Year Mark

    Abstract: During the first three years of the Obama Administration, 106 new major federal regulations added more than $46 billion per year in new costs for Americans. This is almost four times the number—and more than five times…

  • Backgrounder posted November 16, 2011 by Nicolas Loris New EPA Inspector General Report: One More Reason to Reject Climate-Change Regulation

    Abstract: The Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) has released a report showing that the EPA did not comply with federal data guidelines when providing its technical support document (TSD) for the EPA’s 2009 “endangerment finding.” The EPA used the TSD to…

  • WebMemo posted May 25, 2011 by Diane Katz EPA’s Boiler MACT Rules Still a Threat

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has postponed imposition of unduly onerous regulations governing emissions from hundreds of thousands of commercial, institutional, and industrial boilers. While the action is welcome, it would be premature to conclude that the Obama Administration has undergone a regulatory epiphany. Instead, the postponement reveals the extent…

  • Backgrounder posted January 26, 2011 by Diane Katz Rolling Back Red Tape: 20 Regulations to Eliminate

    Abstract: As the new Congress assembles, many legisla­tors are considering how to lessen the regulatory burden on Americans. President Obama, too, now says that he wants to root out unnecessary government rules. With regulatory costs at record levels, relief is sorely needed. But it…

  • WebMemo posted April 1, 2010 by Ben Lieberman EPA's Global Warming Regulations: A Threat to American Agriculture

    There is little doubt that legislative measures designed to address global warming would greatly burden the agricultural sector. Farming is energy intensive, and cap-and-trade bills--namely the House Waxman-Markey bill, which passed in June, and the Boxer-Kerry bill pending in the Senate--are…

  • WebMemo posted September 15, 2011 by Wendell Cox How Smart Growth and Livability Intensify Air Pollution

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) wants to implement stronger air pollution restrictions on ozone (smog) for the stated purpose of improving public health.[1] These regulations are misguided because they would impose significant costs for little or no benefit.[2] At the same time, policies being implemented at…

  • Lecture posted June 16, 2010 by Ben Lieberman The Economics of Global Warming Policy

    My name is Ben Lieberman and I’m the Senior Policy Analyst for Energy and Environment at The Heritage Foundation. I’m proud to say that I’ve either participated in, or attended, all four of the Heartland Institute’s global warming conferences. If there’s a fifth and a sixth, I’ll be there, too.…

  • Issue Brief posted March 23, 2012 by Jack Spencer Whitfield Stands Up to EPA for Lower Gas Prices

    Congressman Ed Whitfield (R–KY) released legislation yesterday that would force the Obama Administration to reveal how its environmental regulations impact gasoline prices. Specifically, the Gasoline Regulations Act of 2012[1] would create a Transportation Fuels Regulatory Committee consisting of officials from the Departments of Energy,…

  • Commentary posted November 23, 2011 by Nicolas Loris Stuffed with CO2 Regulations

    Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa P. Jackson recently announced that her agency would proceed with twice-delayed regulations targeting power plants that emit carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. Mrs. Jackson’s decision ignores three vital pieces of information that should make it easy for Congress to prevent unelected bureaucrats from regulating…

  • WebMemo posted August 1, 2011 by Andrew Grossman High on Ozone: The EPA’s Latest Assault on Jobs and the Economy

    The U.S. economy won a temporary reprieve with the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) announcement last week that new ozone standards, which had been slated for this summer, will be delayed. The EPA’s “reconsideration” of the ozone standards it set in 2008 and issuance of more stringent standards violate all three…

Find more work on Environmental Protection Agency
  • Issue Brief posted March 23, 2012 by Jack Spencer Whitfield Stands Up to EPA for Lower Gas Prices

    Congressman Ed Whitfield (R–KY) released legislation yesterday that would force the Obama Administration to reveal how its environmental regulations impact gasoline prices. Specifically, the Gasoline Regulations Act of 2012[1] would create a Transportation Fuels Regulatory Committee consisting of officials from the Departments of Energy,…

  • Backgrounder posted March 13, 2012 by James Gattuso, Diane Katz Red Tape Rising: Obama-Era Regulation at the Three-Year Mark

    Abstract: During the first three years of the Obama Administration, 106 new major federal regulations added more than $46 billion per year in new costs for Americans. This is almost four times the number—and more than five times…

  • Backgrounder posted November 16, 2011 by Nicolas Loris New EPA Inspector General Report: One More Reason to Reject Climate-Change Regulation

    Abstract: The Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) has released a report showing that the EPA did not comply with federal data guidelines when providing its technical support document (TSD) for the EPA’s 2009 “endangerment finding.” The EPA used the TSD to…

  • WebMemo posted September 15, 2011 by Wendell Cox How Smart Growth and Livability Intensify Air Pollution

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) wants to implement stronger air pollution restrictions on ozone (smog) for the stated purpose of improving public health.[1] These regulations are misguided because they would impose significant costs for little or no benefit.[2] At the same time, policies being implemented at…

  • WebMemo posted August 1, 2011 by Andrew Grossman High on Ozone: The EPA’s Latest Assault on Jobs and the Economy

    The U.S. economy won a temporary reprieve with the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) announcement last week that new ozone standards, which had been slated for this summer, will be delayed. The EPA’s “reconsideration” of the ozone standards it set in 2008 and issuance of more stringent standards violate all three…

  • WebMemo posted May 25, 2011 by Diane Katz EPA’s Boiler MACT Rules Still a Threat

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has postponed imposition of unduly onerous regulations governing emissions from hundreds of thousands of commercial, institutional, and industrial boilers. While the action is welcome, it would be premature to conclude that the Obama Administration has undergone a regulatory epiphany. Instead, the postponement reveals the extent…

  • WebMemo posted March 3, 2011 by Diane Katz Coming Clean on Regulatory Costs and Benefits

    Just hours before a congressional hearing this week related to the high costs of regulation, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released a report purporting to show that the Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1990 will avert 230,000 premature deaths and yield economic benefits totaling $2 trillion in the year…

  • Backgrounder posted January 26, 2011 by Diane Katz Rolling Back Red Tape: 20 Regulations to Eliminate

    Abstract: As the new Congress assembles, many legisla­tors are considering how to lessen the regulatory burden on Americans. President Obama, too, now says that he wants to root out unnecessary government rules. With regulatory costs at record levels, relief is sorely needed. But it…

  • WebMemo posted May 20, 2010 by Ben Lieberman Senate Should Reject EPA’s Regulatory Overreach on Global Warming

    The Clean Air Act was never intended to address global warming, and regulations attempting to do so would be very troublesome for the economy. Fortunately, the Congressional Review Act was enacted to stop just such bad regulations. S.J. Res. 26, sponsored by Senator Lisa Murkowski (R–AK) would use the act…

  • WebMemo posted April 1, 2010 by Ben Lieberman EPA's Global Warming Regulations: A Threat to American Agriculture

    There is little doubt that legislative measures designed to address global warming would greatly burden the agricultural sector. Farming is energy intensive, and cap-and-trade bills--namely the House Waxman-Markey bill, which passed in June, and the Boxer-Kerry bill pending in the Senate--are…

Find more work on Environmental Protection Agency
Find more work on Environmental Protection Agency
External Resources on Environmental Protection Agency