The Case Against Dodd–Frank: How the “Consumer Protection” Law Endangers Americans

Report Government Regulation

The Case Against Dodd–Frank: How the “Consumer Protection” Law Endangers Americans

April 26, 2016 1 min read Download Report
Norbert Michel
Norbert Michel
Former Director, Center for Data Analysis
Norbert Michel studied and wrote about financial markets and monetary policy, including the reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The Case Against Dodd–Frank: How the “Consumer Protection” Law Endangers Americans grew from a shared concern among the contributing authors about the direction that financial regulation in this country has taken since the 2007–2009 financial crisis due to the regulations of the 2010 Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Rather than dealing with the causes of the crisis, Dodd–Frank exacerbated and compounded the economy’s existing ills. The resulting financial regulatory framework has restrained the economy’s recovery, introduced even more moral hazard, and expanded the number of firms that are too big to fail. The contributors to this volume have used their knowledge of the financial sectors covered by Dodd–Frank to explain problems the act creates, and to propose solutions to them. The contributors have combined their work to paint a more comprehensive picture of this deeply flawed law, and—lest the reader despair—offer proposals for improving the way the financial markets are regulated.

Download The Case Against Dodd-Frank: How the "Consumer Protection" Law Endangers Americans PDF

    Authors

    Norbert Michel
    Norbert Michel

    Former Director, Center for Data Analysis