Deterrence

Our Research & Offerings on Deterrence
  • WebMemo posted November 7, 2011 by Baker Spring, Michaela Bendikova Nuclear Certification for a New Bomber

    The Obama Administration’s 2010 Nuclear Posture Review says that bombers are central to extended deterrence. But at the same time, the Obama Administration is willing to let the capability of the bomber force decline for the next several decades. This makes no sense. … Read more

  • Backgrounder posted February 14, 2011 by Ted R. Bromund, Ph.D., James Phillips Containing a Nuclear Iran: Difficult, Costly, and Dangerous

    Abstract: Proponents of a containment policy toward Iran are ignoring the harsh realities inherent in seriously pursuing such a policy. First, the U.S. has been trying to contain Iran since the Iranian revolution in 1979, with little success. If Iran develops a nuclear weapon,… Read more

  • Lecture posted September 23, 2010 by Keith Payne, Ph.D. New START, U.S. Strategy, and How Much Is Enough?

    Abstract: Force numbers and diversity matter because flexibility and resilience are key to the credibility of U.S. forces for deterrence and assurance. This was true in the past and is even more so now. New START’s limits, includ­ing on some U.S. conventional options, will… Read more

  • Backgrounder posted September 21, 2010 by Baker Spring An Alternative to New START

    Abstract: Finding an effective alternative to New START should begin by recognizing that today’s world of emerging new independent nuclear weapons powers demands a different concept of strategic deterrence than the retaliation-based deterrence of the Cold War. An effective alternative could be negotiated as a follow-on treaty to the Moscow… Read more

  • WebMemo posted August 24, 2010 by Ethel Machi, Jena Baker McNeill New Technologies, Future Weapons: Gene Sequencing and Synthetic Biology

    Since the completion of the human genome project in 2003, there has been a surge of investment and discovery in both the gene sequencing and synthetic biology sectors of biotechnology. While the information contained in genome databases is not inherently dangerous, it can be used for destructive purposes. With synthesis… Read more

  • Backgrounder posted April 14, 2010 by Baker Spring The Nuclear Posture Review's Missing Objective: Defending the U.S. and Its Allies Against Strategic Attack

    Abstract: The chief flaw of the Obama Administration's Nuclear Posture Review is that it fails to make a clear commitment to defend the U.S. and its allies. However, if Congress is willing to press the Administration, it can… Read more

  • Commentary posted April 12, 2010 by James Jay Carafano, Ph.D. Reagan Would Not Start With Todays Russia

    President Obama wants a world without nuclear weapons. So did President Reagan. The similarities end there. How we get to a nuke-free world matters. To mitigate the threat of nuclear war, treaty negotiators must understand what they are up against. That includes understanding how the other parties… Read more

  • WebMemo posted March 8, 2007 by John Tkacik, Jr. A Chinese Military Superpower?

    Members of Congress are considering several bills designed to combat climate change. Chief among them is Senate bill 2191--America's Cli­mate Security Act of 2007--spearheaded by Joseph Lieberman (I-CT) and John Warner (R-VA). This bill would set a limit on the emissions of green­house gases, mainly carbon dioxide from the com­bustion of coal, oil, and… Read more

Find more work on Deterrence
  • Backgrounder posted February 14, 2011 by Ted R. Bromund, Ph.D., James Phillips Containing a Nuclear Iran: Difficult, Costly, and Dangerous

    Abstract: Proponents of a containment policy toward Iran are ignoring the harsh realities inherent in seriously pursuing such a policy. First, the U.S. has been trying to contain Iran since the Iranian revolution in 1979, with little success. If Iran develops a nuclear weapon,… Read more

  • WebMemo posted November 7, 2011 by Baker Spring, Michaela Bendikova Nuclear Certification for a New Bomber

    The Obama Administration’s 2010 Nuclear Posture Review says that bombers are central to extended deterrence. But at the same time, the Obama Administration is willing to let the capability of the bomber force decline for the next several decades. This makes no sense. … Read more

  • WebMemo posted August 24, 2010 by Ethel Machi, Jena Baker McNeill New Technologies, Future Weapons: Gene Sequencing and Synthetic Biology

    Since the completion of the human genome project in 2003, there has been a surge of investment and discovery in both the gene sequencing and synthetic biology sectors of biotechnology. While the information contained in genome databases is not inherently dangerous, it can be used for destructive purposes. With synthesis… Read more

  • Backgrounder posted September 21, 2010 by Baker Spring An Alternative to New START

    Abstract: Finding an effective alternative to New START should begin by recognizing that today’s world of emerging new independent nuclear weapons powers demands a different concept of strategic deterrence than the retaliation-based deterrence of the Cold War. An effective alternative could be negotiated as a follow-on treaty to the Moscow… Read more

  • Commentary posted April 12, 2010 by James Jay Carafano, Ph.D. Reagan Would Not Start With Todays Russia

    President Obama wants a world without nuclear weapons. So did President Reagan. The similarities end there. How we get to a nuke-free world matters. To mitigate the threat of nuclear war, treaty negotiators must understand what they are up against. That includes understanding how the other parties… Read more

  • Backgrounder posted April 14, 2010 by Baker Spring The Nuclear Posture Review's Missing Objective: Defending the U.S. and Its Allies Against Strategic Attack

    Abstract: The chief flaw of the Obama Administration's Nuclear Posture Review is that it fails to make a clear commitment to defend the U.S. and its allies. However, if Congress is willing to press the Administration, it can… Read more

  • Lecture posted September 23, 2010 by Keith Payne, Ph.D. New START, U.S. Strategy, and How Much Is Enough?

    Abstract: Force numbers and diversity matter because flexibility and resilience are key to the credibility of U.S. forces for deterrence and assurance. This was true in the past and is even more so now. New START’s limits, includ­ing on some U.S. conventional options, will… Read more

  • WebMemo posted March 8, 2007 by John Tkacik, Jr. A Chinese Military Superpower?

    Members of Congress are considering several bills designed to combat climate change. Chief among them is Senate bill 2191--America's Cli­mate Security Act of 2007--spearheaded by Joseph Lieberman (I-CT) and John Warner (R-VA). This bill would set a limit on the emissions of green­house gases, mainly carbon dioxide from the com­bustion of coal, oil, and… Read more

Find more work on Deterrence
Find more work on Deterrence
Find more work on Deterrence