Legal Issues

The Heritage Foundation works to restore the courts and legal system to their proper role, which is to protect individual liberty, equality under law, federalism, property rights, and free enterprise, and to enforce the constitutional limits on government.  To that end, our legal experts seek to reign in an activist judiciary which usurps power from the political branches, to reform our civil justice system, and to reverse the dangerous trend to criminalize conduct that is either beneficial or better regulated by administrative means.

HIGHLIGHTS

Our Research & Offerings on Legal Issues
Find more work on Legal Issues
  • Lecture posted August 11, 2009 by Hans Von Spakovsky Democracy in Danger: What States Can Do to Safeguard America's Election System

    A long-time federal prosecutor once told me that as long as elections put people into positions where they can make decisions about how much the government will spend, who will receive the money, and how the government will exercise its power, elections will be important enough to tempt some individuals to steal… Read more

  • Center for Data Analysis Report posted September 11, 2007 by David Muhlhausen, Ph.D. New Analysis Shows Voter Identification Laws Do Not Reduce Turnout

    OVERVIEW The 2000 presidential election sparked a fire­storm of debate relating to election reform in the United States. Since then, academics, the media, and elected officials have proffered opinions and implemented policies related to this important political issue. Topics that have been addressed in recent years range from modernizing voting… Read more

  • WebMemo posted March 14, 2008 by Charles Stimson National Security Letters: Three Important Facts

    National security letters (NSLs) "continue to be important tools in the FBI's national security investigations," according to a major audit of NSL use released yesterday.[1] The audit, commissioned by Congress and undertaken by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) of the Department of Justice,… Read more

  • WebMemo posted September 25, 2009 by Hans Von Spakovsky Defunding ACORN: Necessary and Proper, and Certainly Constitutional

    Barring the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) from receiving federal funds through the Defund ACORN Act is perfectly constitutional. It certainly is not a bill of attainder, as some recent reports have claimed.[1] The House of Representatives voted on September 17, 2009, to specifically prohibit ACORN from receiving… Read more

  • First Principles Series Report posted March 16, 2006 by Matthew Spalding, Ph.D. Making Citizens: The Case for Patriotic Assimilation

    Citizens by birth or choice, of a common country, that country has the right to concentrate your affections. The name of AMERICAN, which belongs to you, in your national capacity, must always exalt the just pride of Patriotism, more than any appellation derived from local discriminations. … Read more

  • Legal Memorandum posted May 15, 2008 by Andrew Grossman 'Sunshine' Should Not Trump Privacy in Civil Litigation

    Revised and updated July 7, 2009 The phrase "secret settlement" has a shady ring to it, even though it denotes nothing more than a contract between two or more parties that is not released to the public--just like nearly all contracts. But the trial bar understands the value… Read more

  • Legal Memorandum posted March 10, 2008 by Hans Von Spakovsky Stolen Identities, Stolen Votes: A Case Study in Voter Impersonation

    On January 9, 2008, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, a case challenging the constitutionality of an Indiana law that requires most individuals who vote in person to present a govern­ment-issued photo identification.[1] Indiana's… Read more

  • Legal Memorandum posted August 29, 2008 by Rachel Brand Making It a Federal Case: An Inside View of the Pressures to Federalize Crime

    Trimming back the federal criminal code by elimi­nating offenses that should be investigated and prose­cuted by the states has long been a goal of policy experts and good-government advocates.[1] This exer­cise in federalism is worthwhile both for its consti­tutional merits and for its effect on government… Read more

  • WebMemo posted May 23, 2007 by James Gattuso Back to Muzak? Congress and the Un-Fairness Doctrine

    "Our massive strategy was to use the Fairness Doctrine to challenge and harass right-wing broadcasters and hope the challenges would be so costly to them that they would be inhibited and decide it was too expensive to continue." --Bill Ruder, Democratic campaign consultant and Assistant Secretary of Commerce, Kennedy Administration[1] "The… Read more

  • WebMemo posted March 3, 2008 by Andrew Grossman Senate CPSC Bill: A Boon for Trial Lawyers at the Expense of Product Safety

    Driving the debate over reauthorization of the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is public concern about the importation of unsafe products from China. In response to this concern, the Senate Commerce Committee has drafted legislation (the forthcoming substitute for the CPSC Reform Act, S. 2045) that is larded… Read more

Find more work on Legal Issues
Find more work on Legal Issues