• Heritage Action
  • More
Jul 08

Scholars & Scribes Review the Rulings: The Supreme Court's 2013-2014 Term

Panel I (11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.)
Noel Francisco, Jones Day and Oral Advocate in NLRB v. Noel Canning 
Mark Rienzi, Columbus Law School, Catholic University, and Oral Advocate in McCullen v. Coakley
Paul Smith, Jenner & Block and Oral Advocate in Harris v. Quinn
John Malcolm, The Heritage Foundation (Moderator)

Panel II (12:00 to 1:00 p.m.)
Jess Bravin, Wall Street Journal
Adam Liptak, New York Times
David Savage, Los Angeles Times
James Swanson, The Heritage Foundation (Moderator) 

The Supreme Court’s 2013 Term will soon be over, but the need for serious analysis has just begun. Did the High Court get the big cases right? Will Congress respond to the Court’s decision in McCutcheon v. FEC, the latest challenge to campaign finance restrictions? What’s the status of the Establishment Clause after Town of Greece v. Galloway? Will more states ban racial preferences in college admissions following Schuette v. BAMN? What is the future of the Recess Appointments Clause after NLRB v. Noel Canning? What are the political implications of McCullen v. Coakley, the abortion speech buffer zone case, and Harris v. Quinn, the challenge to Illinois’ unionization of Medicaid personal care providers? What will the ruling in the Hobby Lobby case mean for President Obama’s signature health care law?

Please join us as our distinguished panels of practitioners, scholars, and correspondents debate these and other rulings from this past term and discuss what is likely to unfold next term.

More About the Speakers