The Heritage Foundation's Lehrman Auditorium
Recently the Supreme Court ruled in Zelman v. Simmons-Harris
that the Cleveland voucher program is Constitutional, opening the
door for other states to enact parental choice programs. Though a
great victory for school choice, it was not the end of the battle.
It was merely the end of the beginning and much work remains both
in the courts and in the court of public opinion.
State legal barriers remain. Over half of the states have Blaine
Amendments that prevent public funds from passing to religious
institutions. Fueled by anti-Catholic bigotry over a century ago,
these provisions make it difficult, although not impossible, to
enact choice programs.
Politics and public opinion remain in play. In state houses,
well-funded unions and other groups continue to oppose parental
choice. Although the choice movement is growing --10 states have
publicly sponsored private school choice programs, from vouchers to
tax credits, and 39 states and the District of Columbia have
enacted charter school laws -- the opposition has dedicated
millions to prevent new gains and roll back existing programs.
Fortunately, public support for parental choice in education
continues to grow.
Where will the next battle play out?
More About the Speakers
Chairman, Education Freedom Fund of Michigan and former member of
the Michigan State Board of Education
Edwin J. Feulner, Ph.D.
Founder, Chairman of the Asian Studies Center, and Chung Ju-yung Fellow