![]() |
Background: On March 31, 2003, the Department of Labor (DOL) issued proposed revisions to its rules for determining whether or not an employee qualified as an executive, administrative, or professional employee, and was therefore exempted from the Fair Labor Standards Act overtime rules and other requirements. The current rules for these “white-collar” exemptions are considered to be outdated, and confusion over their application has led to large lawsuits against employers. Status: The time for public comment has closed. Organized labor has opposed the new rules, and attempts have been made in Congress to forestall changes. To this point these attempts have been unsuccessful. DOL is expected to release final rules in the Spring. Discussion: The Fair Labor Standards Act, originally passed in 1938, establishes forty hours as the standard workweek and provides employees with “time-and-a-half” pay for hours worked over the standard forty. The FLSA provides for exemptions, and just who qualifies as a “white-collar” employee is a critical question for both employers and employees. But many of the current rules that determine who qualifies date back to the 1940s and are in need of an update. Salary levels that employees must receive in order to be considered executives, administrators, or professionals, have not been updated since 1975. Depending on job duties, an employee may be considered exempt while earning as little as $250 per week. The current rules also attempt to evaluate the nature of the work being performed, but in practice this part of the rules has proved to be very difficult to apply. Finally, the current rules do not account for the rise of highly skilled and highly compensated production workers. Confusion over application of the exemptions has lead to private legal judgments as high as $90 million against employers who have misinterpreted the rules, not always in bad faith. The new rules will increase the minimum salary an employer will need to pay before a worker can be considered “exempt” from $250 to $425 a week. At the same time, the rules will be streamlined, making it easier for workers, employers, and investigators to determine whether or not an employee should be eligible for overtime pay. Clarifying and updating the rules will also allow private employers to make more common-sense decisions regarding which employees will and will not be eligible for overtime, lessening the risk of private lawsuits based on FLSA. Finally, by increasing minimum salaries required for exemptions to apply, the proposed regulations will guarantee that low-wage workers receive overtime, bringing enforcement more in line with the intent of the act. Action item: While there is some room for technical changes, such as adjusting the minimum salary to account for local cost of living, the proposed rules should be adopted. This brief was prepared by Heritage Visiting Fellow Paul Kersey. The "Regulation In Brief" is produced weekly by The Heritage Foundation, providing concise summaries of key regulatory issues, along with links to key background material on each issue. To receive "Regulation In Brief" each week in your mailbox, please e-mail Margaret Hamlin at Margaret.Hamlin@heritageorg For more information regarding "Regulation in Brief" and Heritage's regulatory policy program, please contact James Gattuso, Research Fellow in Regulatory Policy, or Erin Hymel, Research Assistant.
|
RESOURCES Department of Labor Resources DOL summary of proposed changes DOL side-by-side comparison of current requirements versus proposed regulation Testimony & Letters GAO Testimony on FLSA to House Committee on Education and the Workforce Economic Policy Institute testimony to the Senate Committee on Appropriations Analysis & Research Heritage Foundation analysis Heritage Foundation analysis GAO Report "Fair Labor Standards Act: White Collar Exemptions in the Modern Workplace" Commentary Edwin J. Feulner, The Heritage Foundation, op-ed "Laboring for Overtime" Dawn Dayton, American Society of Employers, op-ed "Fair Labor Standards Act Unfair?" James Bovard, Cato Institute, magazine article "How Fair Are the Fair Labor Standards?"
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|