In 2004 a bid to reinstate the military draft failed in the House of Representatives by 400 votes. Even so, Tim Kane writes, “the issue will likely be considered again, especially if there are more terrorist attacks on the U.S."
Proponents of the draft often justify their support by claiming that military service is unjust. As Representative Charles Rangel (D-NY), the sponsor of the 2004 bill, wrote in 2002, “A disproportionate number of the poor and members of minority groups make up the enlisted ranks of the military, while most privileged Americans are underrepresented or absent.”
The evidence, however, does not support that claim. Kane examines the demographic composition of enlisted recruits and finds that “the volunteer force is already equitable.” Moreover, he concludes, “It is highly likely that reinstating the draft would erode military effectiveness, increase American fatalities, destroy personal freedom, and even produce a less socio-economically ‘privileged’ military in the process.”
Read
Who Bears the Burden? Demographic Characteristics of U.S. Military Recruits Before and After 9/11
by Tim Kane, Ph.D.