
|
 |
|
The
federal government spent $2.5 trillion in 2005: about 20
percent of gross domestic product (GDP) and 33 percent more
than it spent in 2001. However, the bigger concern is that
Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid spending will explode
when the baby boomers retire, doubling the total federal
budget to nearly 50 percent of GDP by 2050.
Congress has no plan to pay for these promises, and the budget
rules actually hide the total cost from Congress and the
voters. In 2005, unfunded Social Security and Medicare obligations
totaled $36 trillion. When public debt and other traditional
federal liabilities are included, the total U.S. federal
debt is over $46 trillion--the equivalent of a $375,000 home
mortgage for every full-time worker in America, but without
the house. According to the U.S. Comptroller General, this
figure was only $165,000 in 2000. Yet Congress, rather than
confront this growth, has chosen to compound it with the
Medicare drug benefit.
Read Federal
Budget Should Include Long-Term Obligations from Entitlement
Programs by Alison Acosta Fraser
|
 |
The President's Proposed Line-Item Veto Could Help Control Spending
President
George W. Bush has asked Congress to enact the “Legislative
Line-Item Veto Act of 2006.” This proposal, sponsored in
the Senate by Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) and in
the House by Representative Paul Ryan (R-WI), bypasses
the constitutional concerns that led the Supreme Court
to rule the Line Item Veto Act of 1996 unconstitutional
just one year after President Bill Clinton used it to strike
$600 million in spending. While this new line-item veto
could help to control spending, it alone will not solve
the problem of runaway spending. While working out the
details of this legislation with Congress, the President
should also use the tools already at his disposal, such
as the veto and his executive power.
The Stop Over-Spending Act: A Real Opportunity to Limit Spending
The
Stop Over-Spending (S.O.S.) Act, authored by Senate Budget
Committee Chairman Judd Gregg (R-NH) and cosponsored by
over a dozen senators, provides a strong blueprint for
building a budget process that reflects America’s budget
priorities. The S.O.S. Act would create discretionary caps
and temper exploding entitlement costs. It would create
commissions to wrestle with unsustainable entitlement growth
and government waste. The S.O.S. Act includes President
Bush’s line-item veto proposal, a switch to biennial budgeting,
and several enforcement and rules improvements that would
help Congress get a better handle on federal spending.
This package of budget process reforms would help lawmakers
pare back spending trends that would otherwise, within
a decade, require tax increases of nearly $7,000 per household
just to balance the budget.
|
For more on the author:
|
|
|
 |
|
|