www.heritage.org | Heritage research | Policy Blog | PolicyWire Archive June 22, 2006
Federal Budget Should Include Long-Term Obligations from Entitlement Programs
Two from Brian M. Riedl



Subscribe today
to hear events and radio shows at home or on the go.





Restoring American Leadership in World Capital Markets
Tues., June 27, 2006, 12:00 noon |
Details
From the Gulag to the Killing Fields: Personal Accounts of Political Violence and Repression in Communist States
Wed., June 28, 2006, 12:00 noon |
Details
The Big Ripoff: How Big Business and Big Government Steal Your Money
Wed., July 12, 2006, 12:00 noon |
Details
Full event schedule

The federal government spent $2.5 trillion in 2005: about 20 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) and 33 percent more than it spent in 2001. However, the bigger concern is that Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid spending will explode when the baby boomers retire, doubling the total federal budget to nearly 50 percent of GDP by 2050.

Congress has no plan to pay for these promises, and the budget rules actually hide the total cost from Congress and the voters. In 2005, unfunded Social Security and Medicare obligations totaled $36 trillion. When public debt and other traditional federal liabilities are included, the total U.S. federal debt is over $46 trillion--the equivalent of a $375,000 home mortgage for every full-time worker in America, but without the house. According to the U.S. Comptroller General, this figure was only $165,000 in 2000. Yet Congress, rather than confront this growth, has chosen to compound it with the Medicare drug benefit.


Read Federal Budget Should Include Long-Term Obligations from Entitlement Programs by Alison Acosta Fraser

The President's Proposed Line-Item Veto Could Help Control Spending

President George W. Bush has asked Congress to enact the “Legislative Line-Item Veto Act of 2006.” This proposal, sponsored in the Senate by Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) and in the House by Representative Paul Ryan (R-WI), bypasses the constitutional concerns that led the Supreme Court to rule the Line Item Veto Act of 1996 unconstitutional just one year after President Bill Clinton used it to strike $600 million in spending. While this new line-item veto could help to control spending, it alone will not solve the problem of runaway spending. While working out the details of this legislation with Congress, the President should also use the tools already at his disposal, such as the veto and his executive power.

The Stop Over-Spending Act: A Real Opportunity to Limit Spending

The Stop Over-Spending (S.O.S.) Act, authored by Senate Budget Committee Chairman Judd Gregg (R-NH) and cosponsored by over a dozen senators, provides a strong blueprint for building a budget process that reflects America’s budget priorities. The S.O.S. Act would create discretionary caps and temper exploding entitlement costs. It would create commissions to wrestle with unsustainable entitlement growth and government waste. The S.O.S. Act includes President Bush’s line-item veto proposal, a switch to biennial budgeting, and several enforcement and rules improvements that would help Congress get a better handle on federal spending. This package of budget process reforms would help lawmakers pare back spending trends that would otherwise, within a decade, require tax increases of nearly $7,000 per household just to balance the budget.


For more on the author:

Risks and Opportunities of a Rising China by Larry M. Wortzel, Ph.D.
Countering North Korea’s Missiles: The Missile Defense System the U.S. Should Have by Baker Spring
House Appropriators' PART Prohibition Perpetuates Wasteful Spending by Michelle Muccio and Alison Acosta Fraser
The U.S./EU Summit: Tensions in the Transatlantic Relationship by Nile Gardiner, Ph.D.
America’s Growing Reliance on African Energy Resources by Brett D. Schaefer
End Restrictions on Domestic Offshore Energy Production by Ben Lieberman
Marriage and the Welfare of America: the Tenth Anniversary of Welfare Reform by Mike Leavitt
A North Korean Missile Test: Implications for the U.S. and the Region by Balbina Y. Hwang, Ph.D.
A Health Policy Agenda for the House of Representatives by Nina Owcharenko and Robert E. Moffit, Ph.D.
More recent research
In 'economic World Cup,' America has big lead on Europe by Edwin J. Feulner
Waiting for a quality education by Dan Lips
Four simple steps to fix Washington's spending habits by Alison Acosta Fraser
The unending battle against pork barrel spending by Rebecca Hagelin
It's time for wrath over Khan by Peter Brookes
Appropriate actions on Appropriations by Brian Riedl
Compromise may hurt Pence by Tim Chapman
Rising crime by David Muhlhausen
After heavy spending, maybe Congress sees light by Edwin J. Feulner
Destiny awaits by Helle Dale
More recent commentary
 
The generous support of Heritage members is helping to build a better America. Find out how you can help.
214 Massachusetts Ave NE, Washington DC 20002
ph 202.546.4400 | fax 202.546.8328
info@heritage.org
You are subscribed as %%emailaddr_%%.
If at any time you wish to unsubscribe, reply to this email with "unsubscribe" in the subject.