ISSUES  > Taxes
 
 Print This Page Email This Link
March 29, 2002
The Argument for Reality-based Scoring
by The Heritage Foundation
WebMemo #92

The attached chart produces clear evidence of the need for reality-based scoring. It shows that the estimators were consistently wrong, and often by more than 100 percent.

The estimators wrongly forecasted that people's behavior would not change when there were changes in the capital gains tax laws.

The 1986 tax reforms put in place a significant increase in capital gains taxes starting in 1987. So the chart below shows that many people were selling in 1986 before the higher taxes would become law. The estimators wrongly assumed that the higher tax rates would increase revenue.

In 1997, capital gains tax rates were reduced. Estimators, using the failed "static model" forecasted a drop in revenue. Again, they were wrong. The tax rates went down, actual capital gains tax revenue skyrocketed.

Not only is the current "static model" bad; it's bad year after year after year. It's time to switch to a reality-based scoring model.

 
 
 

Sign Up For Our Mailing Lists

Contact An Expert
MEDIA INFORMATION LINE:
Phone: 202.675.1761
Fax: 202.544.6979

Print Interview Requests:
Jim Weidman
Director, Editorial Services
202.608.6145
Jim.Weidman@heritage.org

Opinion Editorial Requests:
Paul Gallagher
Manager, Editorial Services
202.608.6151
Paul.Gallagher@heritage.org

Radio/TV Interview Requests:
Matt Streit
Director
202.608.6156
Matt.Streit@heritage.org

Elizabeth F. Lincicome
Senior Media Associate
202.608.6157
Elizabeth.Lincicome@heritage.org

Israel Ortega
Senior Media Associate
202.608.6176
Israel.Ortega@heritage.org

Audrey Jones
Media Associate
202.608.6159
Audrey.Jones@heritage.org

Asia-Pacific Media Requests:
Nick Zahn
Asia Communications Associate
202.608.6150
Nick.Zahn@heritage.org

-----