An airstrike in
Iraq, undertaken on intelligence provided by Iraqi security forces,
ended the murder spree of the terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi,
leader of the al-Qaeda in Iraq organization. That is good news. But
there is still a war to be won, and Zarqawi's death will not bring
an end to the violence in Iraq. Getting Zarqawi, however, does
demonstrate the resolve of the United States and its allies in the
global war on terrorism. This war can be won with determination,
persistence, and a strategy that frustrates the terrorists' mission
to intimidate free peoples and slaughter innocents with
impunity.
Al-Qaeda
in Iraq
Within in few
months of the overthrow of the Saddam Hussein regime, foreign
terrorists, including Zarqawi (at the time, a known terrorist
wanted for murder in Jordan) journeyed to Iraq to set up
operations. They worked in concert with former members of the
Saddam regime to strike at coalition troops and Iraqi security
forces. Zarqawi also engineered attacks against ethnic groups in
Iraq, with the aim of spurring sectarian violence and civil war.
His specialties were attacking mosques while the faithful were at
prayer and car bombs that slaughtered women on their way to market
or children returning home from school. Zarqawi and his associates
also fanned a growing criminal network in Iraq, outsourcing work to
gangs and kidnapping foreigners to extort payoffs from Western
countries that could be used to fund more attacks. Finally, he
undertook a propaganda campaign, pledging allegiance to Osama bin
Laden and advertising terrorism on the Internet and with videos
meant to inspire would-be terrorists.
The presence of
Zarqawi and al-Qaeda in Iraq demonstrates why the global war on
terrorism is so important. Bin Laden, Zarqawi, and their ilk are
willing to go anywhere in the world where they believe they can
profitably spread their message of hate and frustrate the spread of
freedom and justice. Diminishing the capacity of these groups to
spread global terrorism is this war's most urgent mission.
After
Zarqawi
Zarqawi's end does
not mean an end to violence in Iraq. His network may be disrupted
or diminished by the decapitation of its leadership, but it may
attempt revenge attacks on his behalf or strikes to demonstrate
that al-Qaeda in Iraq is still in the game. Even without Zarqawi,
there are other terrorist and criminal groups hard at work.
To build on this
victory, the United States and its allies must stick to their
strategy in Iraq: continue to build up Iraq's domestic security
forces, support the government, and allow Iraqis to reclaim
responsibility for their own future.
More broadly, the
United States must stay the course in fighting the long war against
transnational terrorism. This means promoting international
cooperation to fight terrorism, waging a war of ideas against
extremist ideologies, and promoting the expansion of freedom,
justice, and economic opportunity.
The U.S. strategy
is working because the terrorists are failing. In Iraq, despite
efforts to disrupt the political process, two free and fair
national elections have been held and a sovereign government was
established. And despite great efforts to inflame sectarian
violence, even the most outrageous atrocities have not sparked a
civil war. Attacks or attempted attacks in Jordan, Saudi Arabia,
Egypt, Spain, and Britain have strengthened the resolve of Middle
East and European states to combat transnational terrorism.
Zarqawi's death is just another example of how little hope the
terrorists have to prevail against the just.
James
Jay Carafano, Ph.D., is Senior Research Fellow for
Defense and Homeland Security in the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom
Davis Institute for International Studies at The Heritage
Foundation.