ISSUES  > Features
 

Medicare Reform: Increasing Choices and Improving Care

by Robert E Moffit, Ph. D.

Download print-friendly version

Action: Start a multi-year process of comprehensive Medicare reform based on patient choice and control and free market competition.

The Issue in Brief

Medicare is in a managerial crisis because it is based on outdated principles of central planning and price regulation. The program is governed by literally tens of thousands of pages of rules, regulations, guidelines, and administrative decisions that cover virtually every aspect of the financing and delivery of medical services for America's senior citizens. This imposes enormous administrative costs on doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers, who must comply with a growing morass of Medicare paperwork. It also compromises the quality of patient care because it is inimical to change, flexibility, and innovation in the financing and delivery of medical services and technology.

Medicare also faces a long-term financial crisis. The rapid aging of the population will double the number of Medicare beneficiaries over the next three decades. As a result, a proportionately smaller base of working taxpayers will be burdened with the payments for the progressively more expensive benefits of a continually growing number of retirees. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that spending on Medicare will double over the next three decades, jumping from 2.3 percent to 5.4 percent of the nation's gross domestic product (GDP). Spending for the combination of Medicare and Social Security will account for 12 percent of GDP in 2030 and will consume more than half of all federal spending, crowding out funding for numerous other federal programs. With Medicare costs outstripping the program's revenues over the next 30 years, Medicare trustees have repeatedly warned Congress that Medicare's financial difficulties are severe. In 2002, the trustees urged " effective and decisive action" to reinforce the very limited reform measures enacted by Congress.1

The majority of members of the National Bipartisan Commission on the Future of Medicare, in 1999, and President George W. Bush, in July 2001, proposed major changes to transform Medicare into a program that resembles the popular and successful Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) that covers Members of Congress, the White House staff, and millions of federal workers and retirees and their families. Such changes would constitute an enormous improvement in the program.

What Happened in 2002

Largely ignoring the challenge of implementing serious Medicare reform, House and Senate Members of both parties focused instead on adding poorly designed prescription drug programs of unknown cost to the already structurally flawed program. Adding a drug benefit without serious structural reform would have been a profound mistake. In the end, the House of Representatives enacted the Medicare Modernization and Prescription Drug Act of 2002 (H.R. 4954), with only limited Medicare reform provisions. The Senate, however, failed to enact any of four complicated and competing Medicare prescription drug proposals.

What to Do in 2003

In 2003, the President and Congress should focus reform efforts on ensuring better coverage for new retirees. Such reform should include the following measures.

  • Allow new retirees to take their health plans into retirement. At a certain date, Congress should allow new retirees who are 65 or older one of two options: enrolling in the conventional Medicare program or taking their private health plan with them into retirement, with a government contribution to offset its cost. This would not only allow for a seamless continuity of coverage and care for retirees, but would also change the fundamental dynamics of the program. Private plans would be under the jurisdiction of a new market-friendly agency created to administer the program, which would take on functions similar to those of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) in the administration of the FEHBP. With a gradual phase-in of reform, Congress could monitor the new option's progress and allow for adjustments in its financing and administration.
  • Issue a prescription drug security card linked to a generous prescription drug security account. Congress should efficiently target generous assistance to those low-income seniors who do not have access to drug coverage through their retirement plans or supplemental coverage. This could be done by giving these seniors prescription drug cards that would function as debit cards linked to retirees' federally subsidized prescription drug accounts. Such accounts for low-income retirees could receive initial deposits of funds between $600 and $800 per year and would include a catastrophic provision for high drug costs. Funds in these accounts could be rolled over, tax-free, from year to year. Higher-income Medicare patients and their spouses could also make tax-free contributions to their new prescription drug accounts. Such a structure would recognize the great diversity in drug utilization among the senior population, guarantee needy seniors quick access to coverage for chronic conditions, facilitate the growth of a competitive market, and maximize personal freedom.
  • Allow new Medicare beneficiaries to take balances accumulated in health reimbursement arrangements, flexible spending accounts, and medical savings accounts with them into retirement. They should be allowed to maintain these as tax-free accounts to which both they and their employers could contribute if they wished to do so. Retirees could pay doctors and other health care professionals directly from these accounts without navigating complex Medicare payment or regulatory restrictions. Millions of employees today have health-related accounts. If new retirees could roll over hundreds of dollars a year tax-free in such accounts, they could freely use those funds for routine medical services or the services of specialists or alternative care--whether or not they are covered by Medicare--as well as for prescription drugs. Such accounts would allow new Medicare patients to maintain the direct relationship with doctors they enjoyed during their working lives. This would increase the economic efficiency of the Medicare program and promote direct patient payment for routine medical services. It would also give doctors the freedom to practice medicine without the costly paperwork and regulatory restrictions currently imposed by the Medicare bureaucracy and its contractors.

Robert E. Moffit, Ph.D. is Director of Domestic Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation.

EXPERTS

The Heritage Foundation

Nina Owcharenko
Health Care Policy Analyst
The Heritage Foundation
214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
Washington, DC 20002
(202) 608-6221
fax: (202) 544-5421
nina.owcharenko@heritage.org

Robert E. Moffit, Ph.D.
Director of Domestic
Policy Studies
The Heritage Foundation
214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
Washington, DC 20002
(202) 608-6210
fax: (202) 544-5421
robert.moffit@heritage.org

Stuart M. Butler, Ph.D.
Vice President, Domestic
and Economic Policy Studies
The Heritage Foundation
214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
Washington, DC 20002
(202) 608-6200
fax: (202) 544-5421
stuart.butler@heritage.org

Daniel H. Johnson, Jr., M.D.
Visiting Fellow in Health Policy, The Heritage Foundation
Clearview Medical Imaging
3100 Clearview Parkway
Metairie, LA 70006
(504) 885 4223
fax: (504) 887 6620
stormyj@aol.com

Other Experts

Joseph R. Antos
Resident Scholar
American Enterprise Institute 1150 17th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20036
(202) 862-5800
fax: (202) 862-7177
janotos@aei.org

John Goodman, Ph.D.
President
National Center for
Policy Analysis
12655 North Central Expressway, Suite 720
Dallas, TX 75243
(972) 386-6272
fax: (972) 386-0924
jgoodman@ncpa.public.policy.org

Edmund F. Haislmaier
President
Strategic Policy Management
777 North Capitol Street, NE
Suite 803
Washington DC 20002
(202) 408-0620
fax: (202) 408-0621
ed@haislmaier.com

Robert B. Helms, Ph.D.
Resident Scholar
Director, Health Policy Studies
American Enterprise Institute
1150 17th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20036
(202) 862-5800
fax: (202) 862-7177
rhelms@aei.org

Sandra Mahkorn, M.D.,
M.P.H., M.S.
3050 South Superior
Milwaukee, WI 53207
(414) 482-0225
fax: (414) 482-9896
smahkorn@prodigy.net

Greg Scandlen
Senior Fellow in Health Policy
National Center for
Policy Analysis
7688 McKaig Road
Frederick, MD 21701
(301) 898-1700
fax: (301) 898-4646
gmscan@aol.com

Michael Tanner
Director of Health and
Welfare Studies
Cato Institute
1000 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
(202) 842-0200
fax: (202) 842-3490
mtanner@cato.org

Grace-Marie Turner
President
Galen Institute
P.O. Box 19080
Alexandria, VA 22320-0080
(703) 299-8900
fax: (703) 299-0721
gracemarie@galen.org

Gail Wilensky, Ph.D.
Senior Fellow
Project Hope
7500 Old Georgetown Road
Suite 600
Bethesda, MD 20814
(301) 656-7401
fax: (301) 654-0629
gwilensky@projhope.org


1. For highlights of the 2002 Medicare Trustees report, see http://www.cms.hhs.gov/publications/trusteesreport/2002/secib.asp.

 

 
 

Sign Up For Our Mailing Lists

Contact An Expert
MEDIA INFORMATION LINE:
Phone: 202.675.1761
Fax: 202.544.6979

Print Interview Requests:
Jim Weidman
Director, Editorial Services
202.608.6145
Jim.Weidman@heritage.org

Opinion Editorial Requests:
Paul Gallagher
Manager, Editorial Services
202.608.6151
Paul.Gallagher@heritage.org

Radio/TV Interview Requests:
Matt Streit
Director
202.608.6156
Matt.Streit@heritage.org

Elizabeth F. Lincicome
Senior Media Associate
202.608.6157
Elizabeth.Lincicome@heritage.org

Israel Ortega
Senior Media Associate
202.608.6176
Israel.Ortega@heritage.org

Audrey Jones
Media Associate
202.608.6159
Audrey.Jones@heritage.org

Asia-Pacific Media Requests:
Nick Zahn
Asia Communications Associate
202.608.6150
Nick.Zahn@heritage.org

-----