|
|
ISSUES > Features
Medicare Reform: Increasing Choices and Improving Care
by Robert E Moffit, Ph. D.
Download print-friendly version
Action: Start a multi-year process of comprehensive Medicare reform based on patient choice and control and free market competition.
The Issue in Brief
Medicare is in a managerial crisis because it is based on outdated principles of central planning and price regulation. The program is governed by literally tens of thousands of pages of rules, regulations, guidelines, and administrative decisions that cover virtually every aspect of the financing and delivery of medical services for America's senior citizens. This imposes enormous administrative costs on doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers, who must comply with a growing morass of Medicare paperwork. It also compromises the quality of patient care because it is inimical to change, flexibility, and innovation in the financing and delivery of medical services and technology.
Medicare also faces a long-term financial crisis. The rapid aging of the population will double the number of Medicare beneficiaries over the next three decades. As a result, a proportionately smaller base of working taxpayers will be burdened with the payments for the progressively more expensive benefits of a continually growing number of retirees. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that spending on Medicare will double over the next three decades, jumping from 2.3 percent to 5.4 percent of the nation's gross domestic product (GDP). Spending for the combination of Medicare and Social Security will account for 12 percent of GDP in 2030 and will consume more than half of all federal spending, crowding out funding for numerous other federal programs. With Medicare costs outstripping the program's revenues over the next 30 years, Medicare trustees have repeatedly warned Congress that Medicare's financial difficulties are severe. In 2002, the trustees urged " effective and decisive action" to reinforce the very limited reform measures enacted by Congress.
The majority of members of the National Bipartisan Commission on the Future of Medicare, in 1999, and President George W. Bush, in July 2001, proposed major changes to transform Medicare into a program that resembles the popular and successful Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) that covers Members of Congress, the White House staff, and millions of federal workers and retirees and their families. Such changes would constitute an enormous improvement in the program.
What Happened in 2002
Largely ignoring the challenge of implementing serious Medicare reform, House and Senate Members of both parties focused instead on adding poorly designed prescription drug programs of unknown cost to the already structurally flawed program. Adding a drug benefit without serious structural reform would have been a profound mistake. In the end, the House of Representatives enacted the Medicare Modernization and Prescription Drug Act of 2002 (H.R. 4954), with only limited Medicare reform provisions. The Senate, however, failed to enact any of four complicated and competing Medicare prescription drug proposals.
What to Do in 2003
In 2003, the President and Congress should focus reform efforts on ensuring better coverage for new retirees. Such reform should include the following measures.
- Allow new retirees to take their health plans into retirement. At a certain date, Congress should allow new retirees who are 65 or older one of two options: enrolling in the conventional Medicare program or taking their private health plan with them into retirement, with a government contribution to offset its cost. This would not only allow for a seamless continuity of coverage and care for retirees, but would also change the fundamental dynamics of the program. Private plans would be under the jurisdiction of a new market-friendly agency created to administer the program, which would take on functions similar to those of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) in the administration of the FEHBP. With a gradual phase-in of reform, Congress could monitor the new option's progress and allow for adjustments in its financing and administration.
- Issue a prescription drug security card linked to a generous prescription drug security account. Congress should efficiently target generous assistance to those low-income seniors who do not have access to drug coverage through their retirement plans or supplemental coverage. This could be done by giving these seniors prescription drug cards that would function as debit cards linked to retirees' federally subsidized prescription drug accounts. Such accounts for low-income retirees could receive initial deposits of funds between $600 and $800 per year and would include a catastrophic provision for high drug costs. Funds in these accounts could be rolled over, tax-free, from year to year. Higher-income Medicare patients and their spouses could also make tax-free contributions to their new prescription drug accounts. Such a structure would recognize the great diversity in drug utilization among the senior population, guarantee needy seniors quick access to coverage for chronic conditions, facilitate the growth of a competitive market, and maximize personal freedom.
- Allow new Medicare beneficiaries to take balances accumulated in health reimbursement arrangements, flexible spending accounts, and medical savings accounts with them into retirement. They should be allowed to maintain these as tax-free accounts to which both they and their employers could contribute if they wished to do so. Retirees could pay doctors and other health care professionals directly from these accounts without navigating complex Medicare payment or regulatory restrictions. Millions of employees today have health-related accounts. If new retirees could roll over hundreds of dollars a year tax-free in such accounts, they could freely use those funds for routine medical services or the services of specialists or alternative care--whether or not they are covered by Medicare--as well as for prescription drugs. Such accounts would allow new Medicare patients to maintain the direct relationship with doctors they enjoyed during their working lives. This would increase the economic efficiency of the Medicare program and promote direct patient payment for routine medical services. It would also give doctors the freedom to practice medicine without the costly paperwork and regulatory restrictions currently imposed by the Medicare bureaucracy and its contractors.
Robert E. Moffit, Ph.D. is Director of Domestic Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation.
EXPERTS
The Heritage Foundation
Nina Owcharenko Health Care Policy Analyst The Heritage Foundation 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE Washington, DC 20002 (202) 608-6221 fax: (202) 544-5421 nina.owcharenko@heritage.org
Robert E. Moffit, Ph.D. Director of Domestic Policy Studies The Heritage Foundation 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE Washington, DC 20002 (202) 608-6210 fax: (202) 544-5421 robert.moffit@heritage.org
Stuart M. Butler, Ph.D. Vice President, Domestic and Economic Policy Studies The Heritage Foundation 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE Washington, DC 20002 (202) 608-6200 fax: (202) 544-5421 stuart.butler@heritage.org
Daniel H. Johnson, Jr., M.D. Visiting Fellow in Health Policy, The Heritage Foundation Clearview Medical Imaging 3100 Clearview Parkway Metairie, LA 70006 (504) 885 4223 fax: (504) 887 6620 stormyj@aol.com
Other Experts
Joseph R. Antos Resident Scholar American Enterprise Institute 1150 17th Street, NW Washington, DC 20036 (202) 862-5800 fax: (202) 862-7177 janotos@aei.org
John Goodman, Ph.D. President National Center for Policy Analysis 12655 North Central Expressway, Suite 720 Dallas, TX 75243 (972) 386-6272 fax: (972) 386-0924 jgoodman@ncpa.public.policy.org
Edmund F. Haislmaier President Strategic Policy Management 777 North Capitol Street, NE Suite 803 Washington DC 20002 (202) 408-0620 fax: (202) 408-0621 ed@haislmaier.com
Robert B. Helms, Ph.D. Resident Scholar Director, Health Policy Studies American Enterprise Institute 1150 17th Street, NW Washington, DC 20036 (202) 862-5800 fax: (202) 862-7177 rhelms@aei.org
Sandra Mahkorn, M.D., M.P.H., M.S. 3050 South Superior Milwaukee, WI 53207 (414) 482-0225 fax: (414) 482-9896 smahkorn@prodigy.net
Greg Scandlen Senior Fellow in Health Policy National Center for Policy Analysis 7688 McKaig Road Frederick, MD 21701 (301) 898-1700 fax: (301) 898-4646 gmscan@aol.com
Michael Tanner Director of Health and Welfare Studies Cato Institute 1000 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001 (202) 842-0200 fax: (202) 842-3490 mtanner@cato.org
Grace-Marie Turner President Galen Institute P.O. Box 19080 Alexandria, VA 22320-0080 (703) 299-8900 fax: (703) 299-0721 gracemarie@galen.org
Gail Wilensky, Ph.D. Senior Fellow Project Hope 7500 Old Georgetown Road Suite 600 Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 656-7401 fax: (301) 654-0629 gwilensky@projhope.org
|
|
|
|