ISSUES  > Energy and Environment

Cold Facts on Global Warming
 

Follow the debate on Heritage's blog, The Foundry.

PolicyResearch | Commentary | Additional Resources 

Why Lieberman-Warner Is Bad for U.S. Economy



Policy Research

June 9, 2008
What is Driving the High Oil Prices?
By Ariel Cohen, Ph.D., and Owen Graham
As oil and gasoline prices surpass $134 per barrel and $4 per gallon, respectively, it is clear that significant change is underway in global energy markets, portending major challenges for the global economy and energy security.

June 9, 2008
The Consumer-First Energy Act of 2008 Will Only Increase Gas Prices and Energy Costs
By Ben Lieberman
Unfortunately for consumers, the energy bill on the fast track right now is the Consumer-First Energy Act of 2008 (S. 3044), introduced by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), which repeats the mistakes of the past by adding constraints that will discourage domestic energy supplies.

June 2, 2008
Nuclear Power Needed to Minimize Lieberman-Warner's Economic Impact
by Jack Spencer
Although many supporters of Lieberman–Warner are quick to call attention to conclusions that show the least negative economic impact, they often fail to mention that the results depend on a massive expansion of nuclear power.

June 2, 2008
The Lieberman-Warner Climate Change Act: A Solution Worse Than the Problem
By Ben Lieberman

America's Climate Security Act of 2007 requires significant emissions reductions before the technologies capable of achieving them affordably are available. The science points away from a need to act precipitously and impose such a dramatic slowing of the economy in such a tight timeframe, and Lieberman-Warner's compliance costs are likely to be far out of proportion to its benefits.

May 30, 2008
Five Myths About the Lieberman-Warner Global Warming Legislation
By Ben Lieberman

Like global warming itself, the bill has been the subject of considerable hype and little hard-nosed analysis. For this reason, there are several myths about it that need to be dispelled.

May 22, 2008
Effect of the Lieberman-Warner Global Warming Legislation on States
By William W. Beach, Ben Lieberman, David W. Kreutzer, Ph.D., and Nicolas D. Loris

The Senate's leading climate-change bill, while aiming to combat global warming by reducing carbon dioxide in the air, actually poses "extraordinary perils" for Americans and the economy from which no state is spared.

May 12, 2008
The Economic Costs of the Lieberman-Warner Climate Change Legislation
By William W. Beach, David W. Kreutzer, Ph.D., Ben Lieberman, and Nicolas D. Loris

The Lieberman-Warner climate change bill is, in many respects, an unprecedented proposal. Its limits on CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions would impose significant costs on virtually the entire American economy, and complicated tariff rules, dependent on evaluating the GHG restrictions of all trading partners, add another unknowable dimension to the costs, fueling the overall uncertainty.

May 2, 2008
Ethanol and Other Biofuels: A Global Warming Solution Worse Than the Problem
By Ben Lieberman

There are risks to global warming policy as well as risks to global warming, and although the former could be costlier than the latter, they are often neglected in climate change debate.

April 18, 2008
Nuclear Power Critical to Meeting President's Greenhouse Gas Objectives
By Jack Spencer

While wind, solar, and clean-coal technologies may eventually affordably contribute to the nation's production of emissions-free power, the best way to achieve President Bush's vision today is through nuclear power.

April 18, 2008
Both Bad and Good in Bush's Climate Change Speech
By Ben Lieberman

President Bush suggested that he will support federal limits on greenhouse gas emissions. This appears to be a reversal after seven years of opposition to mandatory controls on energy in the name of fighting climate change. Indeed, some worried that the speech would announce a final-year capitulation on the issue.

February 6, 2008
The EU's Climate Change Package: Not a Model to Be Copied
By Sally McNamara and Ben Lieberman

European Union elites have long used popular concern about the environment as a way to promote the undemocratic European project, absent any cost-benefit analysis or meaningful measures of success.

Commentary

May 26, 2008
$3.80 Gasoline Too Low? Washington Thinks So
By Ben Lieberman

Millions of vacationers will pay record prices for gasoline as they hit the roads this Memorial Day weekend, and only those who have been in the sun too long would like to see prices climb even higher. Yet several members of Congress seem determined to guarantee that they will.

May 19, 2008
McCain's Global Warming Plan Threatens Economy
By Robert Bluey

It's not that conservatives don't care about the environment -- they do. But in the case of Sen. John McCain's proposal, the benefits-lowering Earth's temperature by no more than the Kyoto projection of 0.007 degrees Celsius-would come at a great cost to America's economy.

May 19, 2008
A Carbon Diet Needs a Healthy Serving of Nuclear Energy
By Jack Spencer and Nicolas Loris

If the government is fixated on the CO2 Reduction Diet, at least it has an effective means to an end in nuclear energy. If government doesn't stand in its way, nuclear energy can help America and the world meet its clean, safe, and affordable energy demands.

May 15, 2008
Climate Control: A Costly Proposal
By Rebecca Hagelin

Think energy is expensive now? Wait until Congress plugs in the Climate Security Act of 2007.

Additional Resources

Alabama Policy Institute
American Council for Capital Formation
American Enterprise Institute
American Legislative Exchange Council
Capital Research Center
Cato Institute
Center for Science and Public Policy
Cooler Heads Coalition
Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow
Competitive Enterprise Institute
Environmental Literacy Council
Fraser Institute - Canada
FreedomWorks
Frontiers of Freedom Institute
George C. Marshall Institute
Georgia Public Policy Foundation
Heartland Institute
Hoover Institution
Hudson Institute
Independent Institute
Institute for Energy Research
JunkScience.com
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
National Association of Manufacturers
National Center for Policy Analysis
National Center for Public Policy Research
Pacific Research Institute
Reason Foundation
Science and Environmental Policy Project
Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works
United States Chamber of Commerce
Washington Policy Center

 
 

Sign Up For Our Mailing Lists

Heritage In Focus
Two Reasons the New EPA Regulations Are a Bad Idea

Contact An Expert
MEDIA INFORMATION LINE:
Phone: 202.675.1761
Fax: 202.544.6979

Print Interview Requests:
Jim Weidman
Director, Editorial Services
202.608.6145
Jim.Weidman@heritage.org

Opinion Editorial Requests:
Paul Gallagher
Manager, Editorial Services
202.608.6151
Paul.Gallagher@heritage.org

Radio/TV Interview Requests:
Matt Streit
Director
202.608.6156
Matt.Streit@heritage.org

Elizabeth F. Lincicome
Senior Media Associate
202.608.6157
Elizabeth.Lincicome@heritage.org

Israel Ortega
Senior Media Associate
202.608.6176
Israel.Ortega@heritage.org

Audrey Jones
Media Associate
202.608.6159
Audrey.Jones@heritage.org

Asia-Pacific Media Requests:
Nick Zahn
Asia Communications Associate
202.608.6150
Nick.Zahn@heritage.org

-----