PRESS  > News Releases
 
Printer-Friendly Version | Send to a Friend
Don't Let Internet Taxes Cross State Lines, Analyst Says

WASHINGTON, FEB. 14, 2000—If Congress decides to lift the current moratorium on Internet taxes, it should let states and localities tax only those companies with a bricks-and-mortar presence in their jurisdiction, says a new paper by Heritage Foundation policy analyst Adam Thierer.

The best solution would be to keep the Internet completely tax free, Thierer says. Short of that, policymakers should follow the precedent set by the taxation of catalog sales, which allows taxes to be levied only on businesses with a physical presence in a state or locality. But what won't work, Thierer says, is the proposal recently issued by the National Governors' Association (NGA), which urges Congress to allow states to levy taxes on all Internet sales, regardless of where the sellers are located. The NGA plan would effectively create a national sales tax that would eventually extend to other forms of commerce, Thierer says.

"The NGA plan is premised on two myths—that the Internet is a massive drain on state and local tax revenues, and that it's unfair to exempt interstate vendors from taxes that Main Street businesses must pay," says Thierer, Heritage's Walker fellow in economic policy. "In reality, state and local tax revenues and budget surpluses are at an all-time high, thanks to a high-tech Internet economy."

The NGA plan also ignores legal precedent and raises constitutional questions by allowing states to collect taxes beyond their geographic borders, says Thierer, who recently debated the NGA's Director of State-Federal Relations on e-taxes in State Tax Notes.

The congressionally appointed Advisory Commission on Electronic Commerce (ACEC), which must offer its recommendations on Internet taxation to Congress by April 21, is divided on whether to approve an e-tax or call for making the moratorium on Internet taxes permanent. The NGA plan currently enjoys the support of several commission members, but a two-thirds majority is needed to forward an official recommendation to Congress.

In a related paper, also released today, Thierer explains how competition and choice in the market are outpacing government "solutions" to the so-called "digital divide" that some say keeps lower-income Americans from enjoying the fruits of the high-tech economy. He notes that Internet access has surged from 6 percent of the U.S. population six years ago to 43 percent today. Recent news events confirm Thierer's point: Ford Motor Co. and Delta Airlines both announced they are giving free computers and low-priced Internet access to every one of their nearly 400,000 combined workers.

In a third paper, Thierer and Heritage researcher Gregg VanHelmond scour President Clinton's fiscal year 2001 budget proposal and find it crammed with $1.9 billion worth of "high-tech pork"—everything from $45 million for something called "tele-mentoring for at-risk youth" to $16 million for "ready to learn digital television."

 
 

Sign Up For Our Mailing Lists

Contact An Expert
MEDIA INFORMATION LINE:
Phone: 202.675.1761
Fax: 202.544.6979

Print Interview Requests:
Jim Weidman
Director, Editorial Services
202.608.6145
Jim.Weidman@heritage.org

Opinion Editorial Requests:
Paul Gallagher
Manager, Editorial Services
202.608.6151
Paul.Gallagher@heritage.org

Radio/TV Interview Requests:
Matt Streit
Director
202.608.6156
Matt.Streit@heritage.org

Elizabeth F. Lincicome
Senior Media Associate
202.608.6157
Elizabeth.Lincicome@heritage.org

Israel Ortega
Senior Media Associate
202.608.6176
Israel.Ortega@heritage.org

Audrey Jones
Media Associate
202.608.6159
Audrey.Jones@heritage.org

Asia-Pacific Media Requests:
Nick Zahn
Asia Communications Associate
202.608.6150
Nick.Zahn@heritage.org

-----
Recent Heritage Research
View All
November 20, 2009
by J.D. Foster, Ph.D.
November 20, 2009
by Karen A. Campbell, Ph.D.
November 20, 2009
by Curtis S. Dubay