Energy and Environment
Advance freedom and prosperity by unleashing free enterprise, protecting America's energy interests, and advancing free global energy markets. Learn More... Statement of Purpose Demand is increasing faster than supplies while much of the world’s oil is delivered in a restrictive market dominated by unstable or hostile nations. Meanwhile, many Americans harbor misunderstandings and myths about energy, the environment, and market forces. They want low prices and plentiful supply, but resist steps that must be taken to achieve these goals. They want to protect the environment but most plans have huge costs and questionable benefits. This confusion leads Congress to enact conflicting policies that harm the nation’s ability to meet its energy needs. Sound policies must enable America to obtain supplies from a wide range of sources in a way that is best for the economy and also addresses homeland and national security considerations.

U.S. energy policy should be based on the creativity of free enterprise. Congress and the Administration should rely on the private sector’s research and development capabilities to deliver traditional supplies and viable new energy sources rather than mandates, regulations, subsidies, and directed research. All sources of domestic energy should be made available and artificial constraints on infrastructure, including costly environmental regulations, removed. Such steps will unshackle delivery of supplies and allow key sources like nuclear energy to achieve their potential. Efforts to reduce dependence on foreign oil or carbon altogether must be grounded in policies that are best for the economy by limiting or removing regulatory and tax barriers that impede private-sector innovation. Internationally, U.S. policy should advance free energy markets by sustaining access to the global marketplace using all instruments of national power. Policies should thwart the capacity of coercive regimes to employ energy supplies as an economic weapon. Americans understand that freedom, opportunity and quality of life suffer when abundant, affordable energy supplies are threatened, not just at home, but worldwide.

The Economic Impact of the Waxman-Markey Cap-and-Trade Bill

June 26, 2009

It is clear that cap and trade is very expensive and amounts to nothing more than an energy tax in disguise. The bottom line is that cap and trade works by raising the cost of energy high enough so that individuals and businesses are forced to use less of it. Inflicting economic pain is what this is all about.

Waxman-Markey Global Warming Bill: Economic Impact by Congressional District

June 25, 2009

It has become quite clear over the past several months that placing a cap on carbon emission will have major implications for the American economy and families.

The High Cost of Cap and Trade: Why the EPA and CBO Are Wrong

June 24, 2009

Proponents of cap and trade point to the low cost estimates by the EPA and CBO as a reason to pass Waxman-Markey. However these estimates are built on false premises.

The Waxman--Markey Global Warming Bill: Is the Economic Pain Justified by the Environmental Gain?

June 23, 2009

My name is Ben Lieberman and I'm the Senior Policy Analyst for Energy and Environment at The Heritage Foundation. I'll be discussing the economics of global warming policy and especially the cost of the Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade bill currently working its way through the House of Representatives. I'll focus on the Heritage Foundation's economic analysis of that bill. But before I do that, I wanted to set out a framework with which to judge Waxman-Markey or any other measure offered up as a solution to the global warming problem--a set of questions that need to be answered before we enact any global warming measures, especially costly ones.

Nuclear Energy Renaissance: Global Supply Chain Critical

June 19, 2009

With protectionist sentiment on the rise, the DOE should be commended for recognizing the critical role that the global nuclear industrial base must play in reestablishing the U.S. nuclear industry.

Smoke gets in your ice

June 30, 2009

Many Americans find the debate in Washington over adopting a "cap-and-trade" program to reduce carbon dioxide a bit confusing. That's understandable. Put simply, it's a tax on energy consumption. In fact, it would be a huge tax. If enacted, cap-and-trade would be one of the government's largest revenue sources within the next decade.

A shock at the pump?

June 1, 2009

They're back. Rising gasoline prices, that is. Millions of Americans hitting the roads over Memorial Day weekend faced prices for regular gas averaging $2.35 per gallon, a full 30 cents higher than at the beginning of the month and nearly 60 cents more than at the start of the year.

A Sure-Fire Economy Killer

May 26, 2009

Some things, virtually everyone agrees on. We all want a cleaner environment. And we all want a booming economy.

Obama Is Costing You $1,300 Per Vehicle

May 26, 2009

Memorial Day is here, a time to commemorate Americans who died serving our nation. Maybe Americans should also pause to commemorate the end of free-market capitalism and the beginning of a new form of economics -- Obamanomics.

Cap and Trade vs. the American Dream: The House's bill is an economic disaster that keeps getting worse

May 22, 2009

The global-warming bill got a chilly reception when it was introduced in the House Energy and Commerce Committee's global-warming subcommittee. It was not only the subcommittee's Republicans but also a number of its Democrats who had serious questions about the proposal to slash greenhouse-gas emissions.

Waxman's Workover

May 20, 2009

Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) is the top dealmaker who wants to re-design America's economy -- and possibly destroy it -- under the guise of saving the Earth from global warming. His deals have bought off coal state Dems (represented by Virginia's Rick Boucher) and those representing automakers' states (such as Michigan's John Dingell).

California: The National Petri Dish

07/02/2009

Supposedly, trends start in California and then spread to the rest of the country, a notion that seems to be confirmed by the latest economic news. In May, California’s unemployment rate hit 11.5 percent—the highest it has been since 1941. This morning we learn that unemployment for the entire country hit 9.5 percent in June—the   Read More...

Treason Against the Planet or Treason Against the Economy?

07/01/2009

After the Waxman-Markey cap and trade bill narrowly passed the House of Representatives (219-212), Nobel Laureate economist Paul Krugman, an avid supporter of global warming legislation, expressed his discontent. His concern was not with the bill but those who voted against it. In his New York Times column Krugman says, “And as I watched the deniers   Read More...

How Did Waxman-Markey Pass the House? Bribes Like This

07/01/2009

From today’s Washington Times: When House Democratic leaders were rounding up votes Friday for the massive climate-change bill, they paid special attention to their colleagues from Ohio who remained stubbornly undecided. They finally secured the vote of one Ohioan, veteran Democratic Rep. Marcy Kaptur of Toledo, the old-fashioned way. They gave her what she wanted - a   Read More...

Time vs. Truth When it Comes to Cap and Trade

07/01/2009

“In fact, they’re all but lying.” Those are pretty strong words to be used in a national news source, especially one that aspires to be an arbiter instead of an advocate. So, it is disappointing that Time magazine would make that statement either in clear ignorance of the facts or as a way of bending   Read More...

An Inconvenient Voice: Dr. Alan Carlin

06/29/2009

Ever hear of Alan Carlin? Probably not, and that is the way the Obama Administration wants to keep it. Dr. Carlin is an Environmental Protection Agency veteran who recently wrote a damaging report, warning that the science behind climate change was questionable at best, and that we shouldn’t pass laws that will hurt American families   Read More...

Alaskan Drilling: Small Area, Big Potential

July 30, 2008
A la Chart 032
  • Alaskan Drilling: Small Area, Big Potential
  • U.S. a Nonstarter in Nuclear Power
  • Chilling Growth to Counter Global Warming
  • Nuclear power's safety by the numbers
  • Paying for the Energy Bill

The Obama Administration is seeking public input on a proposal that would allow drilling for oil and natural gas off the coast of several U.S. states. By opening up domestic energy sources, this policy would help decrease our dependence on foreign oil, which often comes from unstable or hostile nations. Drilling for oil and gas in our own backyard will create American jobs and lower prices for American families filling up their tanks and heating their homes. To express your support for this plan, visit FreeOurEnergy.com.

Twelve Principles to Guide U.S. Energy Policy


Sound national energy policies must enable America to obtain energy supplies from a wide range of sources in a way that is best for the economy and at the same time addresses homeland and national security considerations. An abundant, diverse energy supply is central to America's freedom and prosperity. The guiding principles for an energy strategy that advances freedom and prosperity should emphasize three themes: 1. Unleashing free enterprise, 2. Protecting America's energy interests, and 3. Advancing free global energy markets. Learn More...

Multimedia


Heritage Experts on Energy and Environment

Media Information Line: (202) 675-1761

William

William W. Beach

Director , Center for Data Analysis

Ariel

Ariel Cohen Ph.D.

Senior Research Fellow , The Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies

Alison

Alison Acosta Fraser

Director , Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies

David

David Kreutzer Ph.D.

Senior Policy Analyst in Energy Economics and Climate Change , Center for Data Analysis

Ben

Ben Lieberman

Senior Policy Analyst, Energy and Environment , Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies

Jack

Jack Spencer

Research Fellow , Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies